Transatlantic Relations and the Digital Economy Post-USMCA

The TPP is dead, long live the USMCA.  Despite the United States withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the digital trade chapter of the United States Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA) borrows from and builds off of the earlier TPP’s electronic commerce chapter. It prohibits duties on e-products, such as music and software; bolsters intellectual property protections; bars data localization; protects internet service providers from copyright liability stemming from user content; and requires each of the three countries to establish their own personal data protection (or privacy) laws.

Yet, the USMCA is neither a transatlantic deal nor a biproduct of the Transatlantic Duopoly, which historically set the agenda for the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the subsequent transition from the GATT to the World Trade Organization (WTO). Despite the relaunching of transatlantic trade talks in July, when it comes to the digital economy, it was the U.S., Mexico, and Canada that reached a deal first. Transatlanticism is no longer the sole core of U.S. trade policy and, as a consequence, when it comes to data (and how it moves around the world), the U.S. is looking elsewhere to begin setting some of the rules of the road.

Challenges for Europe and the Digital Economy

The completion of the USMCA negotiations and the upcoming ratification process sets two important challenges for Europe and the global digital economy.  First, as the first mover, it will limit the EU’s policy options in future negotiations by placing a floor in some domains. While many of the benefits will be felt by signatories of both USMCA and any future EU-U.S. deal, if negotiations are concluded, other benefits, such as setting minimum standards in key areas, may be afforded solely to the partner that finalized their deal with the U.S. first.  Second, if a digital trade agreement between the EU and the U.S. is not reached, they risk further balkanization of the “rules of the road” on digital issues as various countries and some country blocs continue to develop their own rules around data (its collection, uses, and movement).

The Upside for Transatlanticism and the Digital Economy

However, while the USMCA may have a first mover advantage over a subsequent EU-U.S. deal, the consequences are not altogether negative for transatlantic relations or the digital economy. Notably, it highlights a wiliness to undertake multilateral agreements, despite the Trump administration’s early focus on a pivot toward bilateralism. Moreover, taken together, the USMCA and any subsequent EU-U.S. deal may yet be an important foundation upon which to include and/or constrain the digital practices of states such as China.

Importantly, such Digital Trade and Investment chapters should not merely be seen as an effort to address the particular trade/investment problems participating states face. They can also be a geo-political undertaking: an opportunity to update trade agreements to the digital realities of the twenty-first century, avoid increasing balkanization of standards and regulations, and re-cement the transatlantic relationship in light of continued deadlock in the WTO.

The views expressed are those of the author(s) alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies.

Melissa Griffith

University of California, Berkeley

Melissa K. Griffith is a PhD Candidate in Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley. She specializes in cybersecurity, international relations, foreign policy, and security studies. Ms. Griffith's dissertation investigates how relatively small countries, with limited resources, have become significant providers of national cyber defense for their populations. Her work sheds important light on the components and dynamics of cyber power and cyber conflict, as well as the vital role that public-private cooperation and both security and economic policy play in cyber defense. Concurrent research projects on cybersecurity examine (1) industrial policy targeting the maintenance and development of domestic cybersecurity capabilities and (2) how the EU can better bolster cyber defense for its own institutions and its member states.

Ms. Griffith’s published work has appeared in Business and Politics and at the Council on Foreign Relations. In addition to academic conferences, she has presented her work for the World Affairs Council, the Research Institute on the Finnish Economy (ETLA), the Cyber Conflict Studies Association (CCSA), and Sift Science Resources. Ms. Griffith holds a BA in International Relations from Agnes Scott College (2011) and an MA in Political Science from the University of California, Berkeley (2014). She was an English Teaching Assistant in Taiwan with the Fulbright Program from 2012-2013.

She is a 2018-2019 participant in AICGS’ project “A German-American Dialogue of the Next Generation: Global Responsibility, Joint Engagement,” sponsored by the Transatlantik-Programm der Bundesrepublik Deutschland aus Mitteln des European Recovery Program (ERP) des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi).